EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
EPAM Systems (4.0/5) edges ahead of LeewayHertz (3.9/5) overall. EPAM Systems is the better choice for global enterprises running AI programs with deep CEE delivery depth. LeewayHertz is the stronger option for US buyers wanting broad generative AI coverage in one agency. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1993 | 2007 |
| HQ | Newtown, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Team size | 62,000+ | 150-300 |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Public-company scale with historical delivery roots across EU member states in Central Europe | Backed by The Hackett Group's consulting network following its 2024 acquisition |
| Pricing model | Retainer or dedicated team, enterprise contracting | Fixed project or dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Python, AWS, Azure | Python, PyTorch, OpenAI API |
| Industries served | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Media & entertainment | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Manufacturing |
EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz: overview
EPAM Systems
EPAM Systems dates to 1993, co-founded in New Jersey and Minsk by Arkadiy Dobkin and Leo Lozner, and has traded on the NYSE as an S&P 500 constituent since 2012. It employed roughly 62,850 people across more than 55 countries at the end of 2025, with deep historical delivery roots in Central and Eastern Europe, including EU member states like Poland and Hungary. AI transformation engineering is a marketed practice area within a much larger digital engineering business.
LeewayHertz
LeewayHertz has operated from San Francisco since 2007, though ownership changed in September 2024 when The Hackett Group acquired the company. Employee counts have shifted from roughly 300 in earlier reporting to about 182 by mid-2026. No European office is publicly listed, so EU clients would contract with a purely US-based (now Hackett Group-owned) entity.
Services and capabilities: EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz
| Capability | EPAM Systems | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Generative AI | ✓ | ✓ |
| Machine learning | ✓ | ✓ |
| AI agents | ✗ | ✓ |
| MLOps | ✓ | ✗ |
| AI consulting | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price projects | ✗ | ✓ |
| Dedicated team model | ✓ | ✓ |
Tech stack comparison: EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz
| Framework / platform | EPAM Systems | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | ✓ | ✓ |
| OpenAI API | N/A | ✓ |
| TensorFlow | N/A | N/A |
| PyTorch | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz
| Criterion | EPAM Systems | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Dedicated team, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Not public |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz
| Dimension | EPAM Systems | LeewayHertz |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce | Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce |
| Best use cases | Running an AI transformation program spanning multiple EU regions and business units., Needing a publicly-traded vendor for audit or procurement compliance reasons. | Consolidating several generative AI workstreams under one US-based vendor relationship., Working with an agency backed by a larger consulting parent for enterprise credibility. |
| Typical project type | Dedicated team | Fixed project |
EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz: pros and cons
| EPAM Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Public-company financial disclosure that no private firm on this list can match. |
| + | Deep, decades-old delivery presence across Central and Eastern European EU member states. |
| + | Scale to staff several large AI programs across regions simultaneously. |
| + | S&P 500 membership lets enterprise procurement teams vet it through standard due diligence. |
| - | US headquarters means the parent legal entity sits outside the EU |
| - | AI sits inside an enormous engineering business rather than functioning as a dedicated specialty |
| LeewayHertz | |
|---|---|
| + | Broad coverage across generative AI, machine learning, and AI agents under one agency. |
| + | The Hackett Group acquisition adds access to a larger consulting and benchmarking network. |
| + | Close to two decades of operating history predating the current AI boom. |
| + | High volume of published technical content makes its approach easy to evaluate before hiring. |
| - | No publicly listed European office or legal entity |
| - | Now owned by The Hackett Group as of 2024, which may shift long-term positioning |
Who should choose EPAM Systems?
A typical fit: running an AI transformation program spanning multiple EU regions and business units.
Public-company scale with historical delivery roots across EU member states in Central Europe. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Media & entertainment.
Who should choose LeewayHertz?
A typical fit: consolidating several generative AI workstreams under one US-based vendor relationship.
Backed by The Hackett Group's consulting network following its 2024 acquisition. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Retail & e-commerce, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | LeewayHertz |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Systems |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EPAM Systems (Not disclosed) vs LeewayHertz (Not disclosed) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Systems |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | EPAM Systems |
Use case fit: EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz
| Use case | EPAM Systems fit | LeewayHertz fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Running an AI transformation program spanning multiple EU regions and business units. | Strong | Limited | EPAM Systems |
| Needing a publicly-traded vendor for audit or procurement compliance reasons. | Strong | Limited | EPAM Systems |
| Consolidating several generative AI workstreams under one US-based vendor relationship. | Limited | Strong | LeewayHertz |
| Working with an agency backed by a larger consulting parent for enterprise credibility. | Limited | Strong | LeewayHertz |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz
EPAM Systems (4.0/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Development projects. Public-company scale with historical delivery roots across EU member states in Central Europe.
LeewayHertz (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need working with an agency backed by a larger consulting parent for enterprise credibility. If your situation matches that, LeewayHertz is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EPAM Systems vs LeewayHertz FAQ
Is EPAM Systems better than LeewayHertz?
EPAM Systems (4.0/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EPAM Systems's strongest advantage: public-company financial disclosure that no private firm on this list can match. LeewayHertz's strongest advantage: broad coverage across generative AI, machine learning, and AI agents under one agency.
How do EPAM Systems and LeewayHertz differ in pricing?
EPAM Systems uses retainer or dedicated team, enterprise contracting pricing. LeewayHertz uses fixed project or dedicated team pricing. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EPAM Systems or LeewayHertz?
LeewayHertz is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EPAM Systems and LeewayHertz?
EPAM Systems's primary differentiator is: public-company scale with historical delivery roots across EU member states in Central Europe. LeewayHertz's primary differentiator is: backed by The Hackett Group's consulting network following its 2024 acquisition. They also differ in team size (62,000+ vs 150-300), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Financial services, Healthcare vs Financial services, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.